Standard

The Testing Framework (document format) specifies a testing framework defining a methodology for the development of the test strategies, test systems and resulting test specifications. The present document identifies the implementation under test (scope of the testing), the format for the test specification, the test architecture, the points of control and observation, the naming conventions (e.g. for test case ID and test case grouping ID), etc. It also provides the Implementation Conformance Statement which is basically a checklist for a client-owner so they know what parts of the specification will be tested and if any is optional. The ICS will be published as a separate GS.

The present document is a choice of Test Purposes Description Language (TPDL), with the intention to capture all of the information required by the Test Template and should be parseable using software.

Methods for testing whether TETRA Voice plus Data (V+D) Base Station (BS) and Mobile Station (MS) equipment and TETRA Direct Mode Operation (DMO) equipment achieve the performance specified in ETSI EN 300 392-2 [1]. Specific test methods for DMO equipment are recommended in annex F of the present document. The purpose of these specifications is to provide a sufficient quality of radio transmission and reception for equipment operating in a TETRA system and to minimize harmful interference to other equipment. The present document is applicable to TETRA systems operating at radio frequencies in the range of 137 MHz to 1 GHz. Versions V3.3.1 [i.5] and earlier of the present document specified the methods used for type testing. The minimum technical characteristics of TETRA Voice plus Data (V+D) Base Station (BS) and Mobile Station (MS) equipment and TETRA Direct Mode Operation (DMO) equipment and radio test methods to be used for providing presumption of conformity, are now specified in ETSI EN 303 758

The goal is to have a technical survey for mitigating against threats introduced by adopting AI into systems. The technical survey shed light on available methods of securing AI-based systems by mitigating against known or potential security threats. It also addresses security capabilities, challenges, and limitations when adopting mitigation for AI-based systems in certain potential use cases

This Recommendation offers a description of the extended producer responsibility (EPR) system in dealing with e-waste. It expands on the different existing forms of EPR globally, not only in theoretical terms, but also with a practical view on their feasibility, challenges and pre-requisites. It presents the definition of the EPR system, in addition to the roles and responsibilities of the different stakeholders, the different types of EPR as well as how and why they could be used in certain contexts and not in others. The funding mechanism behind every mode and the organizational structure expected to be in place are also presented. The Recommendation concludes with many best practices from the international arena including developed, developing and emerging economies, as well as the challenges faced in some cases.

This standard is a logical extension to IEEE 1872-2015 Standard for Ontologies for Robotics and Automation. The standard extends the CORA ontology by defining additional ontologies appropriate for Autonomous Robotics (AuR) relating to: 1) The core design patterns specific to AuR in common R&A sub-domains; 2) General ontological concepts and domain-specific axioms for AuR; and 3) General use cases and/or case studies for AuR.

The present document describes the problem of securing AI-based systems and solutions, with a focus on machine learning, and the challenges relating to confidentiality, integrity and availability at each stage of the machine learning lifecycle. It also describes some of the broader challenges of AI systems including bias, ethics and explainability. A number of different attack vectors are described, as well as several real-world use cases and attacks.

The frequency bands used for broadcasting below 30 MHz are: •Low Frequency (LF) band: from 148,5 kHz to 283,5 kHz, in ITU Region 1 [1] only; •Medium Frequency (MF) band: from 526,5 kHz to 1 606,5 kHz, in ITU Regions 1 [1] and 3 [1] and from 525 kHz to 1 705 kHz in ITU Region 2 [1]; •High Frequency (HF) band: a set of individual broadcasting bands in the frequency range 2,3 MHz to 27 MHz, generally available on a Worldwide basis. These bands offer unique propagation capabilities that permit the achievement of: •large coverage areas, whose size and location may be dependent upon the time of day, season of the year or period in the (approximately) 11 year sunspot cycle; •portable and mobile reception with relatively little impairment caused by the environment surrounding the receiver. There is thus a desire to continue broadcasting in these bands, perhaps especially in the case of international broadcasting where the HF bands offer the only reception possibilities which do not also involve the use of local repeater stations.

Recent world events have created a heightened social focus on public protection and general public safety. Actions such as the Universal Service Directive requiring the European emergency call number (112) to be enhanced with the provision of caller location and the Seveso II Directive aimed at the prevention of major accidents involving dangerous substances highlight this focus. Special consideration may have to be given to the elderly, the disabled and the young people. An annotated bibliography of documents dealing with human factors can be found in ETSI SR 001 996. The provision of effective communication is one of the most important duties of a public authority towards its citizens. An important component required to meet this duty is the ability for Authorities to communicate with citizens during times of emergency. Authorities and emergency response teams need to warn and inform the public in times of crisis and therefore is required to have effective, high quality communication methods and systems to meet this need. The responsibility for emergency response or disaster-related communications is addressed differently from country to country. In most cases, the parties responsible for warning and informing the public follow the country's administrative structures with coordinators at both the local and national levels, as well as across multiple disciplines and departments. The present document catalogues the requirements on warning and informing the public as seen by the Emergency Services Community and looks at the technologies and methods available to do this, and also addresses IoT devices that act upon receiving a (specific) warning message.

Automatic identification and data capture marking and labelling - Subject of care and individual provider identification

This document describes the framework of the big data reference architecture and the process for how a user of the document can apply it to their particular problem domain.

This document defines a set of Fetch metadata request headers that aim to provide servers with enough information to make a priori decisions about whether or not to service a request based on the way it was made, and the context in which it will be used.